The package was missing every script behind the KM (lrn.) curves and both learned table rows: exp_learned's driver, the merge that folds the learned rows into sec_compare.csv and refresh_summary.csv, and the report that reads the learned numbers back. It was also missing sec_keylen_perm.csv, so Fig. 3 could not be regenerated at all, and the two diagnostics that answer why a fixed key beats a learned one here and where a learned mask would win instead. The learned artifacts themselves are regenerated. They were trained on the cross-entropy alone, which drifts to disjoint sparse supports: 99 percent of each key's energy on about six of the 64 entries, so a digit is decided over a sixth of its period and the key set is a choice of support rather than a dense direction in R^L. They are now the regularized keys of Section V-C, and check_consistency asserts which of the two families the figures draw. Verified from inside this repository: replot_security.py rebuilds all seven result figures, make_tables.py reproduces both result tables, and check_consistency.py passes every check that does not need the manuscript. The README now lists what ships. Its run list, layout and figure map had none of the learned pipeline, named two tables the manuscript renders as prose, and gave Fig. 3 no data file for its permutation curve.
141 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
141 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
# Keyed Masking for Secure Multi-User Semantic Communication
|
|
|
|
Reproducibility package for the manuscript *Mask-as-Key Secure Multiple
|
|
Access for Semantic Communications: Physical-Layer Encryption and
|
|
Jamming Robustness*, submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Information
|
|
Forensics and Security.
|
|
|
|
Every figure and table in the paper is regenerated from this
|
|
repository. Experiment scripts write CSV files to `data/` and never
|
|
draw; `replot_security.py` reads only `data/` and writes the figure PDFs
|
|
to `fig/`; `make_tables.py` prints the LaTeX rows of the result tables.
|
|
|
|
## Idea
|
|
|
|
Multi-user semantic communication superposes several users on one frame
|
|
and multiplies each user embedding by a distinct pattern so that the
|
|
receivers can separate them. This code treats that pattern as a secret
|
|
key. One keyed operation then encrypts each user against a receiver
|
|
without the key, separates the users, and spreads a jammer that does not
|
|
hold the key, at no extra bandwidth, power, or rate.
|
|
|
|
## Layout
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
code/
|
|
sse_lib.py transmit and receive core, channel, training, OMA reference
|
|
exp_full.py stages A-F and L: SNR sweep, key length, jamming across
|
|
schemes, key families, scheme comparison, attack difficulty
|
|
exp_kpa.py stage H: known-plaintext attack on the key
|
|
exp_refresh.py stage K: the key-refresh layer, invariance group
|
|
exp_permkpa.py permutation-key known-plaintext attack (Fig. 7)
|
|
check_cov_*.py ciphertext-only covariance-attack checks (referee M1)
|
|
exp_real_sec.py stage G: real BERT WordPiece token streams
|
|
verify_math.py closed-form checks V1-V11, PASS/FAIL and verify_math.csv
|
|
exp_learned.py every KM (lrn.) artifact, one function per stage
|
|
run_learned_reg.py runs those stages in order, sens before brute
|
|
merge_learned_rows.py folds the learned rows into the two table sources
|
|
report_learned.py every learned number beside its structured one
|
|
diag_whygap.py why a fixed key beats a learned one here
|
|
diag_jscc.py where a learned mask would win instead
|
|
replot_security.py every result figure, from data/ to fig/
|
|
make_tables.py LaTeX rows of every result table, from data/
|
|
feasibility_security.py early CPU-sized study, kept for the record
|
|
data/ CSV results, one file per stage
|
|
fig/ figure PDFs, regenerated by replot_security.py
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Reproducing
|
|
|
|
Requires Python 3, PyTorch, NumPy, and Matplotlib. The real-token stage
|
|
additionally needs `datasets` and `transformers`. A CUDA device is
|
|
recommended; the code falls back to CPU. Under Windows install PyTorch
|
|
in WSL, because the native Windows build does not load the CUDA
|
|
libraries.
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
python verify_math.py # closed-form verification, prints PASS/FAIL
|
|
python exp_full.py # stages A-F and L
|
|
python exp_kpa.py # known-plaintext attack
|
|
python exp_refresh.py # the key-refresh layer
|
|
python exp_real_sec.py # real token streams
|
|
python exp_permkpa.py # permutation-key known plaintext
|
|
python exp_infotheory.py # mutual information and equivocation
|
|
python exp_semantic.py # semantic-similarity leakage
|
|
python exp_users_csi.py # load and channel-estimate sweeps
|
|
python check_cov_attack.py # ciphertext-only covariance attack
|
|
python diag_maskdegen.py # learned-key support degeneracy
|
|
python check_family_enum.py # ciphertext-only enumeration of the key family
|
|
python run_learned_reg.py # every KM (lrn.) artifact, regularized keys
|
|
python merge_learned_rows.py # the learned rows of the two result tables
|
|
python replot_security.py # all figures from the CSVs
|
|
python make_tables.py # LaTeX rows of the result tables
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The learned keys are the regularized ones of Section V-C, trained under
|
|
the two penalties rather than under the cross-entropy alone. Training on
|
|
the cross-entropy alone drifts to disjoint sparse supports, which is an
|
|
orthogonal slot allocation rather than a superposition; `diag_whygap.py`
|
|
measures that drift and `exp_learned.learned_model` says why the
|
|
regularized keys are the ones every figure draws.
|
|
|
|
Seeds are fixed: training 1, evaluation 777, attacker key guess
|
|
20260813, key recovery 4242, brute-force search 31, cross-scheme
|
|
comparison 11, key refresh 5150. Re-running reproduces the released CSV
|
|
files.
|
|
|
|
## Conventions
|
|
|
|
Flat Rayleigh fading, one gain per user per frame, with unit mean power.
|
|
A frame carries unit energy, so the SNR in decibels is the frame energy
|
|
over the total noise across all `d` real dimensions, and every scheme in
|
|
a comparison spends the same energy, bandwidth and rate. The
|
|
jamming-to-signal ratio is the jammer energy over the same frame energy.
|
|
Logarithms in an entropy or an information rate are base two.
|
|
|
|
## Figure and table map
|
|
|
|
| Artifact | Script | Data |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Fig. 2 SER against SNR | `exp_full.stage_A`, `stage_N` | `sec_snr.csv`, `sec_snr_learned.csv` |
|
|
| Fig. 3 key length | `exp_full.stage_B`, `exp_learned.keylen`, `.keylen_perm` | `sec_keylen.csv`, `sec_keylen_learned.csv`, `sec_keylen_perm.csv` |
|
|
| Fig. 4 jamming (5 curves) | `exp_full.stage_C`, `stage_L`, `exp_learned.jamming` | `sec_jam_cmp.csv`, `sec_jam.csv`, `sec_jam_learned.csv` |
|
|
| Fig. 5 key sensitivity | `exp_full.stage_I`, `exp_learned.sens` | `sec_sens_cmp.csv`, `sec_sens_learned.csv` |
|
|
| Fig. 6 brute-force search | `exp_full.stage_I`, `stage_F`, `stage_J`, `exp_learned.brute` | `sec_brute_cmp.csv`, `sec_brute.csv`, `sec_brute_learned.csv` |
|
|
| Fig. 7 known-plaintext attack | `exp_kpa`, `exp_permkpa`, `exp_learned.kpa` | `kpa.csv`, `pkpa.csv`, `kpa_learned.csv` |
|
|
| Fig. 8 real token streams | `exp_real_sec`, `exp_learned.real` | `real_sec_ter.csv`, `real_sec_ter_learned.csv` |
|
|
| Scheme comparison table | `exp_full.stage_E`, `exp_learned.compare`, `merge_learned_rows` | `sec_compare.csv` |
|
|
| Key families (Sec. VI-G prose) | `exp_full.stage_D` | `sec_maskfam.csv`, `sec_regjam.csv` |
|
|
| Headline recovery (Sec. VI-H prose) | `exp_real_sec` | `real_sec_stats.json` |
|
|
| Key refresh table | `exp_refresh`, `exp_learned.refresh`, `merge_learned_rows` | `refresh_summary.csv`, `refresh_kpa.csv` |
|
|
| Information-theoretic leakage | `exp_infotheory` | `infotheory.csv` |
|
|
| Semantic similarity | `exp_semantic` | `semantic.csv` |
|
|
| Load and channel-estimate sweeps | `exp_users_csi` | `users.csv`, `csi.csv` |
|
|
| Permutation-variant check | `exp_full.stage_M` | `perm_variant.csv` |
|
|
|
|
Run one stage on its own with `python code/exp_full.py stage_B`, or the whole chain with no argument.
|
|
| Key-space attacks (Sec. VI-F) | `check_family_enum` | `family_enum.csv` |
|
|
| Covariance attack (Sec. IV) | `check_cov_attack` | `cov_attack.csv` |
|
|
| Learned-key degeneracy (Sec. VI-F) | `diag_maskdegen` | `maskdegen.csv` |
|
|
| Closed-form and symbolic checks | `verify_math` | `verify_math.csv` |
|
|
| Why a fixed key wins here (not in the paper) | `diag_whygap` | `whygap.csv` |
|
|
| Where a learned mask would win (not in the paper) | `diag_jscc` | `jscc.csv` |
|
|
|
|
## Security scope
|
|
|
|
The analysis covers an adversary that observes transmitted frames. The
|
|
masking is linear, so an adversary that also learns the indices some
|
|
frames carried recovers the key from a few frames, which `exp_kpa.py`
|
|
measures. The key must therefore be refreshed per coherence block from a shared
|
|
seed. `exp_refresh.py` implements that layer and shows why it has to
|
|
draw from the transformations that leave the decision statistic
|
|
invariant: a refresh that installs fresh orthogonal keys instead costs
|
|
the legitimate users a factor of 2.3, while the invariant
|
|
refresh costs nothing and raises the per-block key from 23.8 to 364.6
|
|
bits.
|
|
|
|
## License
|
|
|
|
MIT for the code. The AG News data and the language-model tokenizer are
|
|
obtained from their own sources under their own terms.
|